The following comments have been submitted:
Comment #1Page Number: draft amendment vs email lumens/wattComment Intent: Not an ObjectionComment Type: EditorialComment: The email sent out to communicate regarding this amendment lists 60 and 90 lumens/watt, whereas the draft amendment lists 50 and 80 lumens/watt. I'm just making sure that the email language was incorrect, and the standard is accurate, or vice versa.
The email sent out to communicate regarding this amendment lists 60 and 90 lumens/watt, whereas the draft amendment lists 50 and 80 lumens/watt. I'm just making sure that the email language was incorrect, and the standard is accurate, or vice versa.
Comment #2Page Number: 1Paragraph / Figure / Table / Note: 3.2Comment Intent: ObjectionComment Type: TechnicalComment: Many light fixtures do not contain lamps or bulbs that are separable from the fixture, and thus cannot have their efficacy measured separately from the fixture. Proposed Change: 3.2 Definitions Qualifying Tier II Light Fixture – A light fixture located in a Qualifying Light Fixture Location that contains lamps/light bulbs with an average luminous efficacy equal to or greater than 50 80 lumens/watt or an outdoor light fixture that is controlled by a photocell or an indoor fixture controlled by a motion sensor. Qualifying Tier I Light Fixture – A light fixture located in a Qualifying Light Fixture Location that contains lamps/light bulbs with an average luminous efficacy equal to or greater than 50 lumens/watt and less than 80 lumens/watt. For fixtures whose light source efficacy is not measurable separately from the fixture, the fixture efficacy shall be at least equal to or greater than 50 lumens/watt and less than 80 lumens/watt. Qualifying Light Fixture Locations – For the purposes of rating, those light fixtures located in kitchens, dining rooms, living rooms, family rooms/dens, bathrooms, hallways, stairways, entrances, bedrooms, garage, utility rooms, home offices, and all outdoor fixtures mounted on a building or pole. This excludes plug-in lamps, closets, unfinished basements, and landscape lighting.
Many light fixtures do not contain lamps or bulbs that are separable from the fixture, and thus cannot have their efficacy measured separately from the fixture.
3.2 Definitions Qualifying Tier II Light Fixture – A light fixture located in a Qualifying Light Fixture Location that contains lamps/light bulbs with an average luminous efficacy equal to or greater than 50 80 lumens/watt or an outdoor light fixture that is controlled by a photocell or an indoor fixture controlled by a motion sensor. Qualifying Tier I Light Fixture – A light fixture located in a Qualifying Light Fixture Location that contains lamps/light bulbs with an average luminous efficacy equal to or greater than 50 lumens/watt and less than 80 lumens/watt. For fixtures whose light source efficacy is not measurable separately from the fixture, the fixture efficacy shall be at least equal to or greater than 50 lumens/watt and less than 80 lumens/watt. Qualifying Light Fixture Locations – For the purposes of rating, those light fixtures located in kitchens, dining rooms, living rooms, family rooms/dens, bathrooms, hallways, stairways, entrances, bedrooms, garage, utility rooms, home offices, and all outdoor fixtures mounted on a building or pole. This excludes plug-in lamps, closets, unfinished basements, and landscape lighting.
Comment #3Page Number: 1-2Paragraph / Figure / Table / Note: whole documentComment Intent: ObjectionComment Type: TechnicalComment: The proposed change substitutes language from the working draft of ASHRAE 90.2. It is a good idea substantively in that it credits extra-high efficiency lighting. However, it could be better: the proposal establishes an arbitrary definition of extra-high efficiency that will be obsolete by 2020 or so, and the credit is quantized for no apparent reason, rather than continuous. It also fails to credit lighting controls that are just as effective at saving energy than efficacy improvements, and may enable future Demand Response savings as well. This amendment is preferable for the substantive reasons noted above and for a key process reason: it uses language that has already been subject to ANSI public review without receiving any adverse comment; and it harmonizes with the expected language in ASHRAE 90.2-201x (which otherwise mostly harmonizes with RESNET 301). The language was originally developed and vetted by the Lighting Subcommittee of ASHRAE SSPC 90.2, which includes members with greater lighting expertise than is available on the RESNET SDC. The concept behind this proposal is that: Control credits are provided for controls above and beyond the normally-installed on-off switch based on utility studies of metered energy savings The credit is based on the ratio of luminous efficacy observed by the rater compared to a base case of typical 2006 practice. However, the credit cannot be larger than the reduction in installed wattage compared to a base case; thus High-intensity use of efficient lighting such that lighting power density is not reduced is not credited; and Credit can be given for efficient portable lighting that the rater can inspect, because the absence of inspectable lighting triggers a default to the reference house for that room. Proposed Change: The contents of the proposal are as follows: [note that a cleaner copy can be sent to the SDC on request]. Delete sections 4.2.2.5.1.3 and .4 as their contents will migrate to Table 4.2.2 (1) Delete section 4.2.2.5.2.2 and .3 as their contents will also migrate to Table 4.2.2(1) Add in definitions from ASHRAE 90.2 working draft as the SDC wishes Add the following to Table 4.2.2 (1) Table Building Component ERI Reference Home Proposed Home [notes] Internal gains from lighting As specified below The internal gains due to lighting shall be reduced by the difference between the standard reference design lighting energy use and the proposed design lighting energy use. Internal Loads from lighting As specified below The internal gains due to lighting shall be reduced by the difference between the standard The internal gains due to lighting shall be reduced by the difference between the standard reference design lighting energy use and the proposed design lighting energy use.reference design lighting energy use and the proposed design lighting energy use. c,d For interior lighting, low efficacy sources (< 45 lm/W) assumed to average 20 lumens per watt and only controlled with standard on/off toggle switches. Choose wattage equal to standard reference design or follow the procedures below. For interior lighting: Use the larger of: We could choose to include ASHRAE informative Appendix H as an Appendix to standard 301. It is appended below P 4.2.2(1) Specifications for the HERS Reference and Rated Homes Interior lighting For interior lighting, assume 20 lumens per watt and only controlled by standard on/off toggle switches. Lighting power density of 1.1 W/ft2 PP Schedule for interior lighting: assume that the equivalent Full Load Hours Per Year =414,000/CFA + 727 Annual Energy Use, interior=1.1 W/ft2xCFA x Full Load Hours/yr 2 CFA x Full Load Hours Per Year (IP) Interior = SI-11 W/m2 PP x CFA x Full Load Hours Per Year (SI) CFA = conditioned floor area Choose wattage equal to standard reference design or follow the procedures below: For interior lighting Use the larger of: 1) actual lighting power or 2)1.1 W/ft2 PP P P divided by the ratio of the power- weighted efficacy of installed lighting compared to 20 lumens per watt x CFA ER = Efficacy Ratio = (total lumens / total watts) / 20 See informative appendix H for detailed examples. Using the same lighting schedule as in the Standard Reference Design: Annual Energy Use = wattage as calculated above x CFA x Full Load Hours Per Per Year( Per Year [Full Load Hours Per Year is same as in standard reference design] Garage and Exterior c,db, Exterior Lighting Hours Per Year = 365 x 2.6 = 950 hours per year Annual Energy Use Exterior = (100 + 0.05 x CFA)W x 950 hours The larger of: 1) Actual installed lighting power OR 2) The wattage in the reference building This changes the existing Section 4.2.2.5.2.3 by reducing the hours of use for garages because ASHRAE felt that the implied 1000 hours per year was unrealistic. Interior = 1.1 W/ ftP P x LightingP Lighting ControlsP Garage and Exterior Lighitng Exterior Lighting Exterior lighting hours Per Year =365 x 2.6= 905 Hours per year Annual energy use =(100+0.05 x CFA) x 950 hours/yr Garage Schedule for Garage Hours Per Year = 548 hours per year Annual Energy Use Garage = 100W x 548 = 54,800Wh = 54.8 kWh per year The larger of: 1) Actual installed lighting power OR 2) The wattage in the reference building divided by the ratio of the power- weighted efficacy of installed lighting compared to 20 lumens per watt for exterior and 50 lumens per watt for garage lighting. ER = Efficacy Ratio = (total lumens / total watts) / 20 or 50 b Standard on/off toggle switches Occupancy sensor control – 10% credit Dimmer lighting controls – 20% credit Credit for multiple controls is determined multiplicatively.e P Alternatively, control credits in Table B-2 shall be permitted to be used. . NOTES 1) Installed lighting means lighting that is visible upon inspection for compliance with this standard, and includes plug-in lighting as well as permanently installed lighting. 2 2 If there is no installed lighting in a living space, or less than .10 W/ftP P (1.1 W/mP P) of lighting 2 2 power in a living space, assume 1.1 W/ftP P (11 W/mP P) for that room and 20 lumens per watt. 3) If a space uses both occupancy/vacancy sensors and dimmers then credit is determined multiplicatively. For example, in a kitchen that uses both an occupancy sensor and dimmer, the control credit would be 1-(1.0 - 0.32) X (1.0 -0.40) = 59%. Table B-2 Lighting Control Credits Room Type Occupancy/Vacancy Sensor Dimmer Basement 7 6 Bathroom 19 19 Bedroom 11 20 Closet 7 0 Dining Room 5 22 Exterior 20 0 Garage 10 0 Hall 18 17 Kitchen 32 40 Laundry/Utility Room 6 0 Living/Family Room 18 60 Office 2 6 Other 4 6 Source: CEE Residential Lighting Market Characterization Jan. 2014. B1.2.1 When calculating internal loads that result from interior lighting, the methods prescribed above shall be used in Section 4.2.2.5.2.2. of RESNET/ICC Standard 301 replacing Informative Appendix H: Step-by-step approach for calculating lighting energy using the performance path Prefatory notes: 1. This calculation is optional: the rater is allowed to default to the reference house wattage. 2. This presentation is intended to illustrate how a software application can guide the user to input as much information as he or she wants to collect and process it in the energy calculation software. If the builder wants to take credit for savings, it is best to do this room by room: Begin with the kitchen: the designer installs 120 lumens per watt in an overhead luminaire and an equal wattage of 60 lumens per watt of under-cabinet and over-cabinet lights. The average lumens per watt is 90 for the room. This is 4.5 times higher than the default of 20. The kitchen is 200 ftP 2 P (19 mP 2 P). Total wattage installed is 40 W, which is so low because the target illumination level was a little on the dim side. The wattage by criterion 2 is 200 ftP 2 P*1.1 W/ ftP 2 Por 220 W divided by the ratio 4.5, or 49 watts. Criterion 1 gives 40 W. The input must be the higher of 40 or 49 watts, and the appropriate entry is 49 watts. The next step is the family room of 400 ftP 2 P (37 mP 2 P). The lighting all has an efficacy or 60 lumens per watt and consumes 150 watts. It uses a control with a credit of 10%. The ratio of efficacy is 3. The ratio method gives 400 ftP 2 P * 1.1/3 or 147 W; with a 10% control credit the wattage is .9*147 or 132W. The actual installed wattage is 150 * .9 (control credit) or 135 W. The higher of criterion 1 and 2 is 135 W. The bedroom of 180 ftP 2 Phas just one fixture with a 12 watt LED. This is below the threshold of 0.1 W/ ftP 2 P so it defaults to 1.1 W/ ftP 2 P. The assumption is that one LED will not provide sufficient lighting and the user will install additional lighting that the inspector cannot look at. The second bedroom of 200 ftP 2 P is intended as a home office and has 150 W of linear fluorescent lighting at an efficacy of 100 lumens per watt. The ratio of efficacy is 5, so by criterion 2 the wattage is 200*1.1/5 or 44 watts. But using criterion 1 the actual wattage is 150 so that is what should be entered. In this case, the builder is being penalized for using such intense lighting but nevertheless gets some credit because 150 W is less than 220W (equals 200 ftP 2 P *1.1 W/ ftP 2 P). Other bedrooms and bathrooms are just too much work for the rater and he allows them to default to 1.1 W/ ftP 2 P. But the builder is able to take credit for 220 W minus 49 W in the kitchen, 440W minus 135 W in the family room, and 220 W minus 150 in the second bedroom. Assume the house has a CFA of 1800 ftP 2 P; then the equivalent full load hours is 957, so the energy savings that is credited amounts to 522 kWh per year of credit, plus a reduction in cooling load. BSR/ASHRAE/IES Standard 90.2-2007R a revision to ANSI/ASHRAE/IES Standard 90.2-2007 - Energy-Efficient Design of Low-Rise Residential Buildings First Public Review Draft If the rating wants to consider efficient lighting in other rooms, the savings credit can increase in parallel with the level of inspection and calculation effort.
The proposed change substitutes language from the working draft of ASHRAE 90.2. It is a good idea substantively in that it credits extra-high efficiency lighting. However, it could be better: the proposal establishes an arbitrary definition of extra-high efficiency that will be obsolete by 2020 or so, and the credit is quantized for no apparent reason, rather than continuous. It also fails to credit lighting controls that are just as effective at saving energy than efficacy improvements, and may enable future Demand Response savings as well.
This amendment is preferable for the substantive reasons noted above and for a key process reason: it uses language that has already been subject to ANSI public review without receiving any adverse comment; and it harmonizes with the expected language in ASHRAE 90.2-201x (which otherwise mostly harmonizes with RESNET 301). The language was originally developed and vetted by the Lighting Subcommittee of ASHRAE SSPC 90.2, which includes members with greater lighting expertise than is available on the RESNET SDC.
The concept behind this proposal is that:
The contents of the proposal are as follows: [note that a cleaner copy can be sent to the SDC on request].
Table
Building Component
ERI Reference Home
Proposed
Home
[notes]
Internal gains from lighting
As specified below
The internal gains due to lighting shall be reduced by the difference between the standard reference design lighting energy use and the proposed design lighting energy use.
Internal Loads from lighting
The internal gains due to lighting shall be reduced by the difference between the standard The internal gains due to lighting shall be reduced by the difference between the standard reference design lighting energy use and the proposed design lighting energy use.reference design lighting energy use and the proposed design lighting energy use.
c,d
For interior lighting, low
efficacy sources (< 45 lm/W) assumed to average 20 lumens per watt and only controlled with standard on/off toggle switches.
Choose wattage equal
to standard reference design or follow the procedures below.
For interior lighting:
Use the larger of:
We could choose to include ASHRAE informative Appendix H as an Appendix to standard 301. It is appended below
P
Interior lighting
For interior lighting, assume 20 lumens per watt and only controlled by standard on/off toggle switches.
Lighting power
density of 1.1 W/ft2
PP
Schedule for interior lighting: assume that the equivalent Full Load Hours Per Year
=414,000/CFA + 727
Annual Energy Use, interior=1.1 W/ft2xCFA x Full Load Hours/yr
2
CFA x Full Load Hours
Per Year (IP)
Interior = SI-11 W/m2
x CFA x Full Load
Hours Per Year (SI)
CFA = conditioned floor area
Choose wattage equal to standard reference design or follow the procedures below:
For interior lighting
1) actual lighting power
or
2)1.1 W/ft2
PP P P
divided by the ratio of the power- weighted efficacy of installed lighting compared to 20 lumens per watt x CFA
ER = Efficacy Ratio = (total lumens / total watts) / 20
See informative appendix H for detailed examples.
Using the same lighting schedule as in the Standard Reference Design: Annual Energy Use = wattage as calculated above x CFA x Full Load Hours Per Per Year( Per Year [Full Load Hours Per Year is same as in standard reference design]
Garage and Exterior
c,db,
Exterior Lighting Hours
Per Year = 365 x 2.6 =
950 hours per year
Annual Energy Use Exterior = (100 + 0.05 x CFA)W x 950 hours
The larger of:
1) Actual installed lighting power
OR
2) The wattage in the reference building
This changes the existing Section 4.2.2.5.2.3 by reducing the hours of use for garages because ASHRAE felt that the implied 1000 hours per year was unrealistic.
Garage and Exterior Lighitng
Exterior Lighting
Exterior lighting hours Per Year =365 x 2.6= 905 Hours per year
Annual energy use =(100+0.05 x CFA) x 950 hours/yr
Garage
Schedule for Garage Hours Per Year = 548 hours per year
Annual Energy Use
Garage = 100W x 548
= 54,800Wh = 54.8 kWh per year
2) The wattage in the reference building divided by the ratio
of the power- weighted efficacy of installed lighting compared to 20 lumens per watt for exterior and 50 lumens per watt for garage lighting.
ER = Efficacy Ratio = (total lumens / total watts) / 20 or 50
b
Standard on/off toggle
switches
Occupancy sensor
control – 10%
credit
Dimmer lighting controls – 20% credit
Credit for multiple controls is determined multiplicatively.e
Alternatively, control credits in Table B-2 shall be permitted to be used. .
power in a living space, assume 1.1 W/ftP P (11 W/mP P) for that room and 20 lumens per watt.
3) If a space uses both occupancy/vacancy sensors and dimmers then credit is determined multiplicatively. For example, in a kitchen that uses both an occupancy sensor and dimmer, the control credit would be 1-(1.0 - 0.32) X (1.0 -0.40) = 59%.
Table B-2 Lighting Control Credits
Room Type
Occupancy/Vacancy Sensor
Dimmer
Basement
7
6
Bathroom
19
Bedroom
11
20
Closet
0
Dining Room
5
22
Exterior
10
Hall
18
17
Kitchen
32
40
Laundry/Utility Room
Living/Family Room
60
Office
Other
4
Comment #4Page Number: 1-2Paragraph / Figure / Table / Note: 3.2Comment Intent: Not an ObjectionComment Type: TechnicalComment: Traditionally, lighting efficiency has been measured separately for lamps and for luminaires (fixtures). However, for many solid state lighting (SSL) products, including recessed downlight trim kits, the light source cannot be separated from the luminaire. RESNET standards have to-date focused on the “luminous efficacy” of the “lamp/light bulbs” and ignored the optical efficiency of the luminaire. A typical recessed downlight luminaire/fixture is only 50-60% efficient, meaning up to half of the light output is wasted. (Reference: http://www.cool.conservation-us.org/byorg/us-doe/recessed_downlight.pdf) Where a SSL “lamp/light bulb” is used (most commonly an omnidirectional screw-in bulb) it makes sense to treat it the same as any other lamp/light bulb, as this draft does. However, because the light source in many integrated SSL products is inseparable (i.e., the entire product must be replaced at end of life) we believe it would be more appropriate to compare that product’s “luminaire efficacy” to the system efficacy of a standard bulb in a recessed downlight fixture. In order to do this, we propose adding a new threshold of 65 lumens/watt that would be applicable to “integrated solid state lighting luminaires.” At that threshold, a qualifying luminaire would be equivalent to 100+ lumens/watt bulb in the typical recessed downlight. Proposed Change: 3.2 Definitions Qualifying Tier II Light Fixture – A light fixture located in a Qualifying Light Fixture Location that contains lamps/light bulbs with an average luminous efficacy equal to or greater than 80 lumens/watt; an integrated solid state lighting fixture with a luminaire efficacy of 65 lumens/watt; or an outdoor light fixture that is controlled by a photocell; or an indoor fixture controlled by a motion sensor. Qualifying Tier I Light Fixture – A light fixture located in a Qualifying Light Fixture Location that contains lamps/light bulbs with an average luminous efficacy equal to or greater than 50 lumens/watt and less than 80 lumens/watt. Qualifying Light Fixture Locations – For the purposes of rating, those light fixtures located in kitchens, dining rooms, living rooms, family rooms/dens, bathrooms, hallways, stairways, entrances, bedrooms, garage, utility rooms, home offices, and all outdoor fixtures mounted on a building or pole. This excludes plug-in lamps, closets, unfinished basements, and landscape lighting.
Traditionally, lighting efficiency has been measured separately for lamps and for luminaires (fixtures). However, for many solid state lighting (SSL) products, including recessed downlight trim kits, the light source cannot be separated from the luminaire. RESNET standards have to-date focused on the “luminous efficacy” of the “lamp/light bulbs” and ignored the optical efficiency of the luminaire. A typical recessed downlight luminaire/fixture is only 50-60% efficient, meaning up to half of the light output is wasted. (Reference: http://www.cool.conservation-us.org/byorg/us-doe/recessed_downlight.pdf)
Where a SSL “lamp/light bulb” is used (most commonly an omnidirectional screw-in bulb) it makes sense to treat it the same as any other lamp/light bulb, as this draft does. However, because the light source in many integrated SSL products is inseparable (i.e., the entire product must be replaced at end of life) we believe it would be more appropriate to compare that product’s “luminaire efficacy” to the system efficacy of a standard bulb in a recessed downlight fixture. In order to do this, we propose adding a new threshold of 65 lumens/watt that would be applicable to “integrated solid state lighting luminaires.” At that threshold, a qualifying luminaire would be equivalent to 100+ lumens/watt bulb in the typical recessed downlight.
3.2 Definitions
Qualifying Tier II Light Fixture – A light fixture located in a Qualifying Light Fixture Location that contains lamps/light bulbs with an average luminous efficacy equal to or greater than 80 lumens/watt; an integrated solid state lighting fixture with a luminaire efficacy of 65 lumens/watt; or an outdoor light fixture that is controlled by a photocell; or an indoor fixture controlled by a motion sensor.
Qualifying Tier I Light Fixture – A light fixture located in a Qualifying Light Fixture Location that contains lamps/light bulbs with an average luminous efficacy equal to or greater than 50 lumens/watt and less than 80 lumens/watt.
Qualifying Light Fixture Locations – For the purposes of rating, those light fixtures located in kitchens, dining rooms, living rooms, family rooms/dens, bathrooms, hallways, stairways, entrances, bedrooms, garage, utility rooms, home offices, and all outdoor fixtures mounted on a building or pole. This excludes plug-in lamps, closets, unfinished basements, and landscape lighting.