Proposed MINHERS Addendum 56, HERS Modeler QA, Draft PDS-01

Comment #1

Amendment: Proposed MINHERS Addendum 56, HERS Modeler QA, Draft PDS-01
Page Number: 2
Paragraph / Figure / Table / Note: 904.3.2.4
Comment Intent: Not an Objection
Comment Type: General

Comment:

904.3.2.4 HERS Modelers. For HERS Raters utilizing HERS Modelers, the Quality Assurance Designee shall ensure that a QA File review is completed on a minimum of one (1) rating on a completed home per year.  The HERS Modeler QA File reviews may fulfill all of the HERS Rater's annual QA File review requirement.

 

The HERS Modeler QA requirement (above) is not consistent with the QA requirements for any other RESNET designation. We recommend at least a 1% review of the total number of registered ratings for each HERS Modeler per year, although 10% would be in alignment with the Rater File QA requirement.

 

However, we do need clarification on what makes a HERS Modeler eligible for a File QA. Some business models only use HERS Modelers to create the take offs & template software files, but would not involve any field data entry, & other business models will be the exact opposite. What work would the HERS modeler have to complete on an address in order to be eligible for a File QA on that address? More specifically, what is the minimum amount of involvement a HERS Modeler would have and still be eligible for File QA?

Proposed Change:

904.3.2.4 HERS Modelers. For HERS Raters utilizing HERS Modelers, the Quality Assurance Designee shall ensure that a QA File review is completed on a minimum of one (1) rating on a completed home per year. at least 1% of the total number of registered ratings shall receive QA File review per year. The HERS Modeler QA File reviews may fulfill all of the HERS Rater's annual QA File review requirement.

or 

904.3.2.4 HERS Modelers. For HERS Raters utilizing HERS Modelers, the Quality Assurance Designee shall ensure that a QA File review is completed on a minimum of one (1) rating on a completed home per year. at least 10% of the total number of registered ratings shall receive QA File review per year. The HERS Modeler QA File reviews may fulfill all of the HERS Rater's annual QA File review requirement.

 

Additional: 

  • Provide clarification on what makes a HERS Modeler eligible for a File QA. What work would the HERS modeler have to complete on an address in order to be eligible for a File QA on that address? More specifically, what is the minimum amount of involvement a HERS Modeler would have and still be eligible for File QA?

Comment #2

Amendment: Proposed MINHERS Addendum 56, HERS Modeler QA, Draft PDS-01
Page Number: 2
Paragraph / Figure / Table / Note: 904.3.2.3
Comment Intent: Not an Objection
Comment Type: General

Comment:

904.3.2.3 Parties included in QA File review. The QA File review shall assess the rating as a whole and any feedback shall be shared with all HERS Raters/RFIs/HERS Modelers participating in the rating.

 

In what capacity are all certified individuals supposed to be "involved" with a QA File review? It’s our understanding that the Rater of Record is responsible for the accuracy of the rating file, so are they still the responsible party for making corrections & acknowledging the review feedback? Or is the intent that the other parties involved are also held accountable for the corrections?

 

Proposed Change:

We recommend having one responsible party for all corrections, but also require that all parties involved must acknowledge that they have reviewed the QA feedback.

 

904.3.2.3 Parties included in QA File review. The QA File review shall assess the rating as a whole.  The Rater of Record is responsible for the accuracy of the rating file and is  the responsible party for making corrections and acknowledging the review feedback.    and any fFeedback shall be shared with all HER Raters/RFIs/HERS Modelers participating in the rating. and each shall acknowledge they have reviewed the QA feedback.


Return to Proposed MINHERS Addendum 56, HERS Modeler QA, Draft PDS-01